Bridges are the structures which are constructed to connect the way separated by river or valley. In India, there are different codes which are used to design bridges. Each code have different design provisions and methods. This study IRC codes which are used to design bridges which is based on limit state method. In this study, three single span of T-beam bridge of 10m, 15m and 20m length are designed as per IRC codes and analyzed with the help of STAAD pro software for moving load & Seismic loads. The IRC Class AA loading is considered for applying the moving load where as the seismic load for different zones with different soil type are considered. It has be concluded that e more or less similarities were found in the results as the span increases the results also gets increased
Introduction
I. INTRODUCTION
A bridge is a structure built to span a physical obstacle (such as a body of water, valley, road, or rail) without blocking the way underneath. It is constructed for the purpose of providing passage over the obstacle, which is usually something that is otherwise difficult or impossible to cross. There are many different designs of bridges, each serving a particular purpose and applicable to different situations. Designs of bridges vary depending on factors such as the function of the bridge, the nature of the terrain where the bridge is constructed and anchored, and the material used to make it, and the funds available to build it. Highway bridges have been designed and built since the advent of the wagon, and the general structure types used and described in this chapter are not likely to change. There are many areas where these structure types can be improved—hence the need for future research.
The research needs for highway bridges (and for that matter, bridges of all uses) fall into five general areas:
Optimize structural systems
Develop ways to extend service life
Develop systems to monitor bridge conditions
Develop details and methods to accelerate bridge construction
Develop a full life cycle approach to bridge data management
II. T- BEAM BRIDGES
T- beam bridges have cast-in-place, reinforced concrete beams with integral deck sections to either side of the tops of the beams. In cross section the beams are deeper than their deck sections, which produces the T-shape that gives them their names. The primary reinforcing steel is placed longitudinally in the bottom of the beam to resist the tension (the forces that would pull apart) on the beam. The deck that forms the top part of the T-shape is subject to compression (forces that squeeze or push it together). As concrete resists compression, it is concentrated in the deck along with less substantial reinforcing steel laid across the width of the bridge.
III. OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the present study are-
To analyse deck type T beam Slab Bridge.
Seismic analysis of deck type T beam slab bridges
Design the same with the help of STAAD Pro. software.
IV. METHODOLOGY
Below is the following methodology used.
Study of IRC Codes and IS codes for design & analysis of Bridge
Modelling of T-beam bridge on STAAD Pro Software.
Analyzing the Structure for moving Load & Seismic Load
Computing the result & comparing
Concluding the best type of bridge.
V. DETAILS OF THE STRUCTURE
This includes all the details required by the designer for carrying out analysis
Grade of concrete (Superstructure)-M30
Grade of steel-HYSD Bar as per IS 1786 Fy=500MPa
Length of Bridge- 30m
Span – 10m, 15m & 20 m
Overall Width – 12 m
Percentage of camber- 2.5%
Cover-75 mm for foundation and 40mm elsewhere
Nature of traffic (live load)
IX. FUTURE SCOPE
Further the same study can be applied for the different types of bridges
Comparison can also be done on the basis of loading combinations and its effect on different parameters
Analysis can also be done using different software’s like ETAB, SAAP
Analysis can also be done on the foundation of bridges
Comparisons on the effect of foundation in case of different zones
Comparisons on the effect of foundation in case of different types of soil
Conclusion
After designing and analyzing the 10m, 15m and 20m single span of RCC T- beam bridge using IRC Class AA Loading, the results are compared. The models are compared toward every zone and different types of soil. All codes have varying design philosophy. Therefore, conclusions which are made from the above comparisons are as follow.
1) It can be seen from all the figs that Bending Moment for 10m span is less as compared to the 15m or 20m span
2) This same case implies for the all the result conditions in case or maximum shear force, maximum reaction force.
3) The variation in each span gives a difference of around 26 % for 15m and 40% for 20m span
4) The value of bending moment denotes the amount of steel reinforcement required in the bridge.
5) As the span increases the amount of steel reinforcement will also increase which can go around 20mm dia to 40mm dia
6) The shear forces denote the amount of shear reinforcement required for the structure if the amount of shear reinforcement decrease this will results in shear crack in bridge and results in collapse.
7) The amount of deflection gives a proper idea about the sagging when the span increases.
8) So, the overall length of bridge girder should be less to withstand the forces and to have a economical design.
9) As we start comparing the models of different zones and we move to zone II to zone III and so on the maximum bending moment goes on increasing.
10) Similarly, when we compare three different types of soil in a particular zone then the maximum bending moment is for soft soil and and minimum is for hard soil and it gets applied for all spans.
11) This same case implies for the all the result conditions in case or maximum shear force, maximum reaction force.